NEW Use QuantLogic in Claude or ChatGPTSee how
Research
5 min readNovember 8, 2026FrançaisEspañol

Gold after a sweep of yesterday's high: the money sits on Fed afternoons

Over the past year, a short after gold sweeps yesterday's high did well near scheduled news and badly at midday. Taken apart, two things carried it: Fed decision afternoons, where every trade won but on only 5 or 6 days, and the first trading hour, with or without news. The market reason is clear. It does not beat luck yet, so we fixed the rule today and will score it on the months to come.

LeadEvents · GCAll researchPDF

The question

Our coin-flip study found one basic idea on gold that beat a coin flip at the same bars: a rejection of yesterday's high or low. On the platform, the short side looked much better inside an event window, the minutes around a scheduled US release. We wanted to know whether the news does the work, or something else that happens at the same time.

What we ran

  • Gold futures, 1 Sept 2025 to early Nov 2026, on 1-minute and 5-minute bars. One micro contract, costs included.
  • The trigger: price trades above yesterday's high, then the short. The stop and target are fixed and sized on recent volatility. No other filter.
  • Each trade is tagged by whether a scheduled US release was near and by time of day: the first hour, the Fed afternoon, and the rest of the day.
  • Luck check: each session takes another session's results at the same minute, 2,000 times. Because we chose the event window after looking, the honest test lets the luck side pick its best filter from the same list as well.

Results

Over all shorts the idea was mildly positive. Inside an event window it was strong: about three quarters of trades won, against barely break-even outside. It held in both halves of the year, and only 1 of the 12 months that had window trades lost money, by a small amount.

Then we split the window by time of day. The picture changed.

Gold, short after a sweep of yesterday's high, by time of day (Eastern Time)
WhenTradesResult
First hour, near a release15 to 17Profit factor about 1.9 to 2.0
First hour, no release40 to 48Profit factor about 1.4 to 2.1
Fed decision afternoon5 to 6All won
Afternoon, no Fed5 to 7Profit factor 0.5 to 1.5
Midday, no event37 to 42Profit factor 0.7 to 0.8 (loses)
Ranges cover our 1-minute and 5-minute rebuilds. Profit factor is money won divided by money lost, after costs.
Does the event window beat luck?
TestBeats this share of shufflesNeeded
Event window, had it been fixed in advance98%95%
Event window, chosen after looking (the honest test)70 to 74%95%
Event window without the Fed days81 to 88%95%

In the morning, sweeps with a release and sweeps without one did about the same. So in the first hour it is the clock doing the work, not the news. On Fed afternoons the effect is real in the data but rests on a handful of days. What made the filtered result look so good was mostly leaving out the midday sweeps, which lose.

Why it might be so

Release spikes run the stops. Liquidity thins just before a release. The first jolt takes price through yesterday's high, where breakout buyers' entries and short sellers' stops sit. Once those orders are filled, no one is left to buy, the late buyers are trapped, and their exits push price back below the level.

Fed afternoons are the clearest case. The 2 pm statement brings a fast first move, and the press conference half an hour later often reverses it as traders re-read the message. Gold reacts more to the Fed than any of our markets: its 15-minute move after the decision is about 5.4 times a normal day's, against about 2.7 times for NQ and ES. That is a bigger stop run to fade, and a sweep of yesterday's high in that window is often the peak of the first reaction.

In the first hour, overnight positions are being adjusted and false breaks are common whether or not there is news. At midday there is no fuel: without news or the opening flow, a poke above yesterday's high has nothing to reverse it, so the fade loses.

What it means when you test

You do not need a thousand trades when there is a clear market reason, but the reason tells you where to look, not that it works. The honest next step is to fix the rule before more data comes in, so the coming months can score it without hindsight.

On 8 Nov 2026 we fixed two versions: Fed afternoons only, and the first hour or a Fed afternoon. We will report how both do on the trades that come after this date, including if they fail.

Test the idea from this note

Gold: short after a sweep of yesterday's high

Event windowFirst hour

Build it in Analyze on our market data, add or ignore filters, and see its trades, its month-by-month record and its luck check. Numbers in the app run to today, so they differ a little from this note.

Try it in Analyze FreeFree plan, no card

Limits

Six Fed days are not enough to tell a real effect from a lucky streak. The event window was chosen after looking at the results, and it fails the honest luck test. Our rebuild and the platform count slightly different event lists, so trade counts differ a little. About 14 months, one market. This is the past, not a promise, and nothing here says how much to trade.

Simulated results on past market data from 2025 and 2026. Research only, not trading signals or advice. Past results do not promise future ones; see the hypothetical performance disclosure at the bottom of the page.

Get this note as a PDF

Leave your email and the PDF downloads straight away. Easy to keep, print or pass on.

We use your email only as described in our privacy policy

Test your own ideas the same way

Analyze runs any idea on NQ, ES, gold, oil and Bitcoin with costs, both halves and a luck check, so you can see whether it beats chance before you trade it.

Past results on market data, not a forecast. No advice and no signals.

More research

Educational content, not investment advice. Futures trading involves substantial risk of loss. See the risk disclosure.